The New Horsemen Vs. The Regressive Left


I’ll be honest, I never really wanted to write about politics. My primary interests were always history, philosophy and how those studies intersected with my study of all things occult and esoteric. I was always aware that my spurious and sometimes non-sensical ramblings about magic, giants and the New World Order would somewhat taint any serious research or considered political opinion I might give because I would assume that most people don’t believe its possible to both attempt scholarly research on speculative aspects of mysticism whist at the same time maintaining a rational brain on political matters. Truth is however, we’ve reached a point in our civilisation where it’s becoming increasingly salient to enter the political arena and rather than quietly make a disapproving face at people who seek to shout down or shut down political debate, actually become ideologically confrontational to them and force them into retreat.

As a classical English liberal, its been pretty interesting to see the shape of debate in the American political scene because in many ways it has mirrored my own problems with the left in Britain. In the last few years I have seen the goalposts shift significantly in terms of how the pendulum of public opinion swings. It was only a few years ago that I was part of a small political debate group which genuinely lifted my somewhat nihilistic and Anarchistic sentiment towards being politically ‘active’ beyond my own monkeysphere which had formed over years of simply not being able to find people I politically aligned with. It was a welcome challenge to have to maintain consistency among people who could and would call me out on logical errors, but it was only a matter of time before the spectre of Marxism would rear it’s ugly little head and I would find myself in the familiar position of being the only leftist secular humanist in the room who wasn’t enamoured with socialism, leaned far more toward anarchistic individualism and wasn’t looking to embolden or empower the state in order to do my bidding, no matter how compassionate or altruistic my ultimate political goals might be. As a political historian I was all too aware of the Frankfurt school of thought and the necessary expansion of the divisive Hegelian dialectic that socialism required and despite the fact I certainly wasn’t a Blairite by any stretch of the imagination, I welcomed the healthy debate that was happening on the left about what the left should actually be, how it should represent itself and how it should achieve it’s goals.

There was always the creeping thought in the back of mind however, that this kind of healthy debate and reverence for the modern intellectual powerhouses on both sides of the political coin, people like Christopher Hitchens and George Carlin on the left and William F. Buckley and Thomas Sowell on the right, was dying out among modern generations and that with the introduction of the internet, for all it’s positives, we we’re going to start polarising opinion purely due to the propensity of human beings to ignore their cognitive bias and surround themselves with a digital monkeysphere of echo chambering and bias confirmation. I don’t think it’s too difficult to look at the effect of Facebook and Google on the average person and see that this is self-evident, very few people can genuinely engage on the topics they frequently post on and the ability to be anonymous and aggressively debate without having to actually personally address the person or the problem you are debating is a double-edged sword. It has allowed many disenfranchised people to have a voice they previously didn’t, but it has also meant that opinion is not tempered by interaction. This is how we have come to a stage where people on the left and the right find themselves being slandered as Nazi’s for going against the ever-changing prevailing social opinion. It’s funny that we used to go by the unwritten edict that anytime anyone violated Godwin’s Law, we stopped and put the debate back in check. Unwarranted comparisons to Hitler were an accepted violation of the terms of debate, they were an unofficial logical fallacy. There is good reasoning behind this adage. My understanding of the socratic method and my initial forays into political debate were forged in the late 20th and early 21st century when the internet wasn’t the omnipresent and somewhat malevolent force it is today. I learned very quickly that there was no place for political extremes in real debate because they got shouted down by the court of public opinion very quickly. Nazi’s weren’t being identified everywhere because if you turned up to a public debate and actually started espousing fascism or genocide that would be very quickly identified and defeated by better arguments. No fascist would dare walk into a debate with Christopher Hitchens because he would destroy them and no extreme socialist would idly waltz into debate with Peter Hitchens because he would do the same (as his Twitter account shows). Their debates, hell even their stints on C-SPAN are endlessly watchable because they are two brothers with wildly differing political opinions but who have the respect and dignity to actually debate each other properly and because they can’t just scream “FASCIST!!” and “COMMUNIST” at one another as ad hominem, they actually have to develop their wit and repartee in order subtly and lovingly jab at one another.

(So endlessly watchable in fact, I just watched all of that and lost my train of thought)

If there need be a crystallisation of the point I am making here, then it comes in no purer form than at the 7 minute mark in that debate, where Peter Hitchens makes a light-hearted joke that there would be grievance councillors available afterwards if anyone on the left felt offended by any of his opinions or even worse, agreed with them. It is both hilarious and depressing that a mere 2 decades later we have actually reached that point and it’s not a joke, it’s not people ironically parodying, it’s absolutely real. Nobody should be surprised that there was a blowback to Blairite neo-liberalism, that was inevitable. The way New Labour handed the party over to corporate interests and traditionally Conservative foreign policy in order to gain the vote is still considered by many as the direction the party should maintain, but as that inevitably meant that the workers basic needs and rights weren’t going to be addressed by the party created to address them, the workers would eventually revolt and force the party back to its original intention. It’s incredibly unfortunate that this revolt was ultimately directed by the neo-Marxist socialist wing of the party but to be fair, we must all take our share of the responsibility for that. I know I was too buried on Grimouires and fringe conspiracies over the last few years to care too much about the political landscape, but as Brexit and Trump happened those Globalist totalitarian surveillance state conspiracies once again crossed over into the political realm and I found myself once again debating contemporary politics by default. The rise of Jeremy Corbyn should, in reality shock nobody who has been keeping an eye on political trends for a couple of decades. My own experience of my own schools and universities had provided me enough of an insight into how Marxism was being pushed on ever younger students on an alarming scale. I myself once betrayed the Anarchism of my teens and had that fabled image of Che Guevara on my wall, flirted with the tide of the coming socialist revolution, allowed myself to believe intellectuals would bureaucracise our way out of all our societal problems which I felt, bar none, could be placed at the feet of our corporate masters and their bourgeoise. It wasn’t until I was clear of state institutions that I began to read, or for that matter was even presented with the counterpoint to those opinions, and began to understand just how malevolent and dangerous the State is and just how compromised I had been by its decades of propaganda. My own political journey after that mirrored very much the Late Chirsopher Hitchen’s move from Trotskyite to ever more rational individualist classical liberal but in the end I cannot betray my anarchist leanings, so I will never be able to be placed in any of the current identity boxes of the left. This presents a problem.

In 2018 Christopher Hitchens opinions on free speech are tantamount to oppression by the white male patriarchy and would have him branded a fascist. His learned and articulate criticism of Islam, forged in a genuine fight alongside the secular Kurds and years of being a leading debating figure on the edge of the atheist critique of all organised religion, would have him branded a Nazi. This is the shifting of the goalposts, and it has been defined by an embrace of such extreme neo-liberal marxist social attitudes and statism that it has unbalanced the political spectrum. And it’s not just the left who are experiencing the problem, it’s effecting anarchists, classical liberals, conservatives, essentially anyone to the right of Jane Fonda. “e’re it just a few marginalised groups on University campuses it wouldn’t be a problem. It seems however that this march toward totalitarian statism is taking over the debate. If you want egalitarianism and meritocracy as opposed to equality of outcomes the debate is so improperly framed that you will be called a Nazi. It’s why it is now becoming incredibly important not just to speak truths, but speak uncomfortable truths as loudly as possible.

In the wake of the Trump election, the hatred thrown at the right by the socialists in America should be a source of shame, but of course to them it isn’t, they’re Marxists, so it’s a point of pride. These are people who see the policing of speech codes and state uniformitarianism as progressive, they even call themselves such, but as should be self-evident to anybody with an understanding of history it is actually a regressive step. It is a step back from liberty, a step back from the freedom that will allow the natural selection of good ideas and the ability to develop the discernment needed to actually progress. It becomes even worse when you realise that the extreme left politics of the people pushing this ideological censorship means that the grand tradition of Socratic and Aristotelian logic and reasoning on which the enlightenment was based must now take a backseat to puerile identarianism, lest one commit the atrocity of impurity of thought. In the U.S. we saw this manifest with the procession of riots and attempted terrorism by groups like Antifa, BLM and all manner of socialist collectives on university campuses against the likes of Milo Yiannopolous, Christina Hoff-Summers, Ben Shapiro, Steven Crowder, Mike Cernovich and Dave Rubin, all proponents of free speech, all with vastly different perspectives but all subject to the tactics of non-platforming, violent rioting or organised trolling by the extreme left, who view their opinions as ‘Nazi’.


This is why, despite the fact I disagree on many of the opinions they hold, I will continue to share and promote their debates and talks because if the mainstream is going to prostrate itself in the face of the screaming regressive left, then it falls to anyone who still believes in free speech and the open forum of ideas to subvert that in every way possible. As Ben Shapiro says, because the left has embraced this culture of perpetual victim-hood and identity politics, there is a demand for Nazi’s that simply isn’t being met but the actual supply. Genuine fascists and Nazi’s remain incredibly small in number and are mostly pushed to the fringes of political debate, but the regressive left have built their entire identity crusade on the back of the presence of oppressive fascist structures all around us and rather than admitting this is a false precept to begin with, they must now label anything and everything that disagrees with their prescribed solutions as a Nazi, even people who were formerly comrades in arms with the left like Dave Rubin.

Whilst America is truly in the grip of this battle, we are beginning to see it emerge in Britain too. Last week at kings college, Carl Benjamin the English classical liberal and Yaron Brook the Jewish objectivist met to have a debate, and had their party crashed by some brave Antifa warriors who forced the meeting to a different venue. This is an incredibly dangerous precedent but luckily the college administration acted with some grace, and Sargon is not one to cow-tow to intimidation. As with all these events, the SJW’s don’t seem to realise that all they are doing is giving ammunition to free speech advocates to turn around and mow them down with.

As with now infamous encounter Jordan Peterson had with Cathy Newman on the Channel 4 news highlighted perfectly, when confronted with logic the ill-logic of marxist identity politics crumbles incredibly quickly, which is why these regressives have decided that there is no point trying to debate with their political opponents, they must instead character assassinate, try to intimidate or simply shout ad hominem insults at them to try to shut them up.  That debate could not have come at a more relevant time in this cuntry, and Dr. Peterson deserves a medal for leading a bigot to some self-realisations on the unreasonable bullshit she was spouting.

Though the tide seems to be turning in the U.S., Britain appears to be becoming more subtly SJW every day. Ony recently, the despicable racist Munroe Bergdof was hired by a Labour front-bencher as an adivsor on LGBT issues. It certainly isn’t that Ms. Bergdof hasn’t been roundly trashed and humiliated in the court of public opinion for her racial slander, that happened on one of Britain’s top political programmes “This Week”, where a motley assortment of Michael Portillo, Ed Balls and Andrew Neil took her to task on her abhorrent opinions.


But it no longer matters to Labour that these ideologues have been roundly beaten in the court of debate, like the election of Sadiq Kahn or the rise of Justin Trudeau in Canada, the floor is consistently being given those who virtue signal the strongest and those who most neatly fit the identarianism of the regressives. The same problem encountered on American campuses is now being seen on British campuses too and it’s leading to a degradation of debate and a genuine need for the centre right and centre left to become ever more vociferous in its condemnation of the extremes on both sides. In this climate of escalating polarisation, the only entity that truly wins is the state itself, who can both use the distraction to enact some pretty disgusting legislation, and has the luxury of having both sides of the debate clawing for more government regulation of speech, ever more totalitarian control of behaviour and ever more consolidated power over every aspect of our daily lives. These ‘progressives’ don’t want freedom, they don’t want liberty and they don’t want diversity or equality in any real terms other than their own warped interpretations of those concepts. They want uniformitarianism under their own flawed ideology, and their secular Marxist bible tells them they can use all the violence and all the underhand tactics they can to achieve it. This makes them just another organised religion in my eyes, these people have replaced the human need for idol worship and religion with their own secular religion of statism and in many ways, it is the most dangerous of all the religions. The need to rebalance the political spectrum and re-assert the importance of logic and reason over appeals to emotion and subjective claims of victimization is becoming ever more pressing, so I won’t apologise for making a point of sharing contrarian, controversial and even offensive counter-points simply for the fact that they need to be heard, debated and if they are illogical or unreasonable, defeated. There are no safe spaces, you are not allowed to go running to a room full of puppies to calm your fragile sensibilities. Grow the fuck up, enter the fray and sharpen your arguments by being proven wrong and refining your understanding, because the alternative is a situation nobody wants.


John Anthony West: 1932-2018

John Anthony West may not have been the first, but he was most certainly the most influential man when it comes to brutally and beautifully destroying any chance I ever had to be an academic professor. I can remember sitting as a kid and watching the absolutely spellbinding Emmy award-winning documentary ‘”The Mystery of the Sphinx”, which laid out the evidence for a radically older dating of that monument than had ever previously been seriously considered, I can remember thinking “this is it, they’re finally going to take Egypt seriously!”. Then I remember the inevitable backlash, the back and forth of the Egyptologists saying “but you’re a Geologist, you haven’t studied Egypt, you don’t know anything about dating” and the Geologists saying “We don’t care what the tools you find say, we know about dating rock, this is hard science and it is correct” and for all intents and purposes this was the stalemate that existed right up until the time I got to University and was finally going to be able to study Egypt in the way I had always wanted, with the resources I had always wanted.

Take a wild guess how that went…


While his most enduring achievement will always be the way in which he popularised and thus, took on the mantle of figurehead for an entire movement of revisionist and alternative Egyptian scholars and to his credit, always attempted to cut through the new-age metaphysical chaff and get to the meat of the different arguments he faced, his real value to Egyptology in the next century will be the way in which he took on and popularised the writings of the rogue mathematician, R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz and through meticulous study of his forms and method, re-opened what can best (but still anachronistically) be called a Hermetic thread of inquiry into everything in Egypt, from the architecture to the art to the entire astrotheological astronomy that it would seem was present from the building of the very first temples, suggesting the Egyptians incredible understanding of mathematics, geometry and thus the mapping of the sky and the earth was already well-formed and understood before the first brick was laid of the first temple of the first dynasty. Earth shattering stuff indeed.

That was until of course Dr. Zahi Hawass showed up. When one opens the dictionary and searches the term “gatekeeper”, there is nothing but a picture of Zahi Hawass’ fat fucking face. From dismissing every contradictory theory to his own as nonsense, to selling digging rights for sexual favours, to stealing artwork and artifacts, to claiming other archeologists discoveries as his own after ridiculing them, to hiding key discoveries or lying about their provenance or importance, to his eventual firing in disgrace, the number of people who that fucking garbage human being must have turned away from studying Egypt and the oldest civilisations in the world by making the entire study prohibitive and purposefully obsfucatory probably can’t be counted. Should you be in any doubt about the despicable nature of the man who held the keys of access to every tomb and temple in Egypt, then watch what happened when finally, after decades of ad hominem attacks and bluster he finally accepted the invitation to debate Grahame Hancock and Robert Bauval only to turn up, call Robert Bauval a thief, declare the whole matter closed and storm off after just minutes.

And so, entire generations had grown up being fed what was essentially a tightly controlled narrative, unrefined and unchanged for the most part since the earliest christian archeologists of Carters ilk searching for proof of the bible, backed up by decades of echo chambering and confirmation bias amongst academics, all lorded over by a demonstrably corrupt asshole who in public declared anyone who claimed civilisation was more than 7,000 years old was a “Pyramidiot”, but in private was giving lectures to Cayce’s A.R.E (and one can only speculate at what other kinds of organisations he was taking those lectures too for a hefty price) about Atlantis and lost civilisations. This was the state of Egyptology when I strolled into university with a Justin Beiber haircut somewhere around the year 2000. It was essentially the same collective half-laugh, half-pants shitting realisation of the gravity of the situation Daniel Jackson gets in Stargate when he starts talking about weird symbols and living gods. Only that’s a movie and is supposed to be a hyperbolic representation of the situation, in reality what was going on in Egyptology was far more ridiculously hyperbolic and cartoonishly conspiratorial than any movie, and it seemed far more badly scripted to hide the plot holes. (So a bit more like the Devil’s Tomb, which I recommend watching purely because I’m certain Cuba Gooding Jr. has to be purposefully acting so terribly as a fuck you to the director, and Ron Perlman’s in it)

The problem was of course, there was no putting the toothpaste back in the tube. Through West’s patronage a steady stream of scholars would emerge, Hancock, Bauval, West himself and his erstwhile companion Dr. Robert Schoch would form the core and become known as the four Horsemen, but from their work would emerge people like Andrew Collins, Dr. Carmen Boulter, Stephen Mehler, David Childress and many other journeymen of different disciplines, from theological scholars like Dr. Joseph Farrell to respected engineers like Christopher Dunne, all who came together from different disciplines, from PhD to amateur auto-didact to follow a decidedly different thread of research than the academic scene wanted to pursue, and in my own opinion there is absolutely no comparison between what they have collectively discovered and the mostly stagnant introspection of the universities.

There is far, far more to Egypt than that which can be discerned from digging in the sand and looking for biomatter to carbon date or trying to find a decent explaination for how the copper tools we find managed to carve perfectly symettrical diorite statues (they can’t) or explaining how they made a building with a 13 square acre footprint line up to within an arc minute of true north using slave labour and logs (they can’t). There is an art, culture and yes, science that we mischaracterize as redundant or alchemical or too metaphysical to be anything more than the fevered rantings of Pharaoh’s or priest cults. The truth is that applying the kind of reductionist materialism we use in today’s mechanical, industrial pursuit of science is entirely the wrong lens to be looking at these things through, and like anything, if the focus is off, you’ll be left with nothing but a blurry image of something from the distant past that you can’t quite identify.  John Anthony West was the guy who tore back that veil and showed beyond any shadow of a doubt that modern esotericism and indeed the groups foremost in pushing that mindset all claim the hidden knowledge of and have their fundamental roots in the Egyptian Stellar cults, the true ‘original’ astrotheological understanding of the universe that led to that first few Dynasties of the early golden age and the true megalithic wonders of Egypt that the following dynasties could only try in vain to match. He showed that it is the Egyptians themselves who hold the keys to understanding and unraveling that mystery and we stand to gain far more by taking the Egyptians at their word and understanding their obsession with proportion, alchemy and dying a good death that we do by dismissing it and trying to pretend that the greatest acheivements of the civilisation came with Greek or Roman invasion, they catagorically did not.

The Anarchy of Information Reigns

Michael Joesph’s excellent series on occult cosmology and science, available at his youtube channel Schism206

The elite (and by that I mean a relatively small number of monied dynasties and their sattelite families who have, for a number of centuries now, consolidated wealth and power into a single global cabal with the stated goal of becoming a single world authority) have become something of a mainstream topic in the last few years. Continue reading The Anarchy of Information Reigns

Trump’s Greater Israel will be the Greatest Israel of All Time…

The time may have come to finally bring the Rothschild’s out of the conspiratorial closet and into the forefront, because what happened today in terms of the U.S. embassy in Israel is perhaps the boldest move Trump’s profit-masters have made on the global stage in quite some time.
About 12 months ago I was being accused of being a Trump supporter, mostly because of the veracity with which I denounced Hillary Clinton. Many couldn’t understand that a vitriolic hatred for one candidate by no means meant support of another, but knowing Clinton’s policies, history, the shady dealings of her foundation and the litany of actually legitimately suspicious dead bodies left in her political wake, there really was no other choice than to pick whoever was running against her.

I did at the time however try to point out that Trump was by no means a lesser evil, there was absolutely no justification whatsoever to vote for Hillary, despite Trump being an inexperienced, narcissistic sociopath the practical and immediate inevitability of a Clinton presidency were far too despicable to entertain, so it was better to go with the man who might fuck the country over in a few years time than go with the woman who would have immediately started world war three by purposefully creating a situation where the US shot down Russian planes and kicked off a possible nuclear confrontation.

Now I’m not right about anything more than anyone else, but I do try at least to maintain some level of political and intellectual consistency on these issues, so here’s what I said in April about Trump’s election:
“it’s important to remember not only who benefits from the balkanization of the middle-east, but also who Donald Trump ultimately owes his fortune, and thus his allegiance to.
While many pointed to Hilary Clinton as the extending and encroaching arm of the banking industry and pointed to shadowy proofs of connections to criminal cabals, (many of which were true) it is Donald Trump who is on the documented financial record as being billions in debt to the Rothschild dynasty through their intervention in the Resorts International scandal. A company which, nobody ever seems to remember, was exposed years later as being a front for the CIA… the first person Trump invited to his stupid golden house was the notorious terrorist Benjamin Netenyahu. Trump was the wrong answer to the right question”

What I was attempting to point out there (whilst not straying into Ken Livingstone territory) was that whilst Wilbur Ross might be more famous at the moment for his exploits in dealing with Russia:

The far more relevant event in the Ross/Trump relationship comes in 1990, the L.A. Times characterises the event thusly

The future president-elect at one time owned a quarter of Atlantic City’s casino market. But Trump was heavily in debt, and he started missing bond payments on his — and Atlantic City’s — largest casino, the Taj Mahal, in 1990.

Ross, then an investment banker working for Rothschild Inc., helped bondholders negotiate with Trump, whose finances were unraveling. The final deal reduced Trump’s ownership stake in the Taj but left him in charge, and bondholders were unhappy when Ross presented the plan.

“Why did we make a deal with him?” one asked, according to Rosenberg’s book.

Ross insisted that Trump was worth saving.

“The Trump name is still very much an asset,” he said.

Trump himself proved to be less of a sure bet. Though the agreement allowed Trump to soldier on in Atlantic City, his casinos landed in bankruptcy court twice more.

What is keenly left out of the L.A. Times article, As Michael Collins Piper (American Free Press) points out in his article Who Towers Behind Trump?, is that before Trump acquired a 93% voting stock in Resorts International, the chain behind the Taj Mahal, it was a CIA front organisation operating under the name Mary Carter Paint which, as the Spotlight Magazine article Piper cites investigating the ‘bondholders’ had as their investors:

• Meyer Lansky, the acknowledged “chairman of the board” and chief financier of the underworld gambling syndicate, who maintained his own longstanding ties to not only Israel and the Mossad, but also the CIA and the American intelligence community (and who was another figure in the JFK assassination – ed.);

• David Rockefeller, head of the Rockefeller financial empire, who provided his family’s clout and CIA and global banking connections to assist in the operation;

• The Investors Overseas Service (IOS), then the world’s largest flight-capital conglomerate, controlling assets worth $2.5 billion.

• Tibor Rosenbaum, who was not only the Mossad’s Swiss-based chief financier behind covert arms deals but also the head of the Banque De Credit Internationale of Geneva, the Lansky syndicate’s chief European money laundry; and

• Baron Edmond de Rothschild of the European banking family and a personal business partner of Rosenbaum in Rosenbaum’s Mossad-related ventures ranging far and wide; and lastly,

• William Mellon Hitchcock, one of the heirs to the Mellon family fortune (one of America’s largest private family fortunes, which, for many years, has also maintained close ties with the CIA).

In 1987, upon the death of longtime CIA front man James Crosby, the nominal head of Resorts International, up-and-coming young New York real estate tycoon Donald Trump stepped into the picture and bought Crosby’s interest in the gambling empire.

Not only does The Spectator note the clear influence of the Rothschild and Rockefeller dynasties on Resorts International, after Donald Trump had run them into the ground over the course of 3 years it was Wilbur Ross, acting on behalf of N.M Rothschild & Sons. where he ran the bankruptcy-restructuring advisory practice, who stepped in to save Trump’s investment and allow him to continue operating, as is documented in the Light & Weber article of March 22nd 1992 printed in Bloomberg. Far be it from me to spend any more of this blog disparaging the good nature of the CIA, but should one take the informational nodes of the Mossad, The Rockefeller’s, the Rothschild’s and the CIA’s near mythical status at the helm of every underworld illicit black market trade operating on American soil and its status as a de facto SS in America, it is by no means a stretch of the imagination to suggest that whether named Mary Carter Paint or Resorts International, the chain never gave up it’s status as a CIA front company and Trump was allowed to continue as the figurehead of the operation purely because, as Wilbur Ross stated, “The Trump name is still very much an asset,”

We’re now a century on from the Balfour declaration and in a relatively short few decades we’ve matured from a position where anyone who brought up the name Rothschild and Balfour in the same sentence was loudly shouted down by the ADL who violently waved the protocols of the Elders of Zion as a defence, to a position where Jacob Rothschild openly goes on television and expounds the virtues of his familial dynasty convoluting and executing the entire proposal.

It has been noted by a few mainstream outlets that the main backer, if not the sole backer of Trump’s embassy move which comes in the seeming absence of any public pressure from Netanyahu or the Israeli state and much to the chagrin of European, Asian and Middle-Eastern partners, is Trump’s largest financial campaign donor, Sheldon Adelson. As Mondoweiss reported:


Eli Clifton notes that Sheldon Adelson– who along with his wife Miriam are Trump’s biggest donors at $35 million — has expressed impatience with the Trump administration’s failure to move the embassy, and expressed fury when Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said he was opposed to the move.

Adelson’s own newspaper in Nevada said that Adelson was nettled by Trump’s hesitancy to move the embassy, in October. While the Times of Israel said that Adelson was so pissed last spring, that he had shut off the “spigot” of cash to Trump.

Trump has a history of pleasing Adelson, which Clifton has documented:

Trump dramatically changed his message on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in particular, saying that he would move the embassy to Jerusalem and wouldn’t call for a freeze on the construction of illegal settlements in the West Bank, as he closed in on the nomination and sought to secure Adelson’s support for his general election campaign.

The failure to talk about Sheldon Adelson’s influence is scandalous when you consider that Adelson did the same thing in the George W. Bush Administration, 18 years ago. Alarmed by the possible division of Jerusalem at Camp David in 2000, neoconservatives including Douglas Feith founded a group called One Jerusalem. Adelson gave money to that group. And at least tons of money to the Republican campaign for the White House, too. And lo and behold, Feith was installed at the Pentagon in a policy-making position. And the “peace process” was backburnered, till Condoleezza Rice demanded Annapolis, and Elliott Abrams fought her every step of the way…

It was only 7 years ago that Adelson became embroiled in yet another CIA honeytrapping scandal, when a Beijing produced report fingered Casino’s owned by the magnate in Macau as fronts for blackmailing and entrapping Chinese officials. His allegiance to Zionist aims in Israel, Mossad and the CIA are worn on his sleeve as much as they publicly can be and they connect a paper trail that elucidates why Trump would push ahead with the kind of Armageddon inducing geopolitical event that the moving of the Embassy and the De Facto U.S. recognition of Jerusalem as the Capital city of Israel.

The endgame is the Israeli takeover of the dome of the rock for the prophesied construction of the third temple. Despite all protestations to the contrary,  the Israeli state and it’s Rothschild owners will not be happy until they have reclaimed what they consider to be the holiest site in their Kabbalistic religion, they have continued the preparations erstwhile. They have proclaimed the birth of the prophesied Red Heifer (a whole host of them infact), the vessels and relics and furnishings have been made and are in storage, and even the final priests have been selected;

A significant step was recently taken towards reinstating the Temple service when the nascent Sanhedrin selected Rabbi Baruch Kahane as the next Kohen Gadol (high priest). The selection was made as a precaution for Yom Kippur. If the political conditions should change, allowing the Jews access to the Temple Mount, they will be required by Torah law to bring the sacrifices. Rabbi Kahane is confident that if that should happen, Temple service could begin in less than one week.

And that is the point. The Mossad’s lap-dog ISIS have done their work in Syria, Lebanon and Iraq and are now retreating so that the political conditions can change and the Rothschild’s can use their billion dollar golden name in letters to bring about The fulfilment of the Balfour declaration and the Zionist agenda in Jerusalem.

Pizza, Presidio and Psy-ops: Part 2

Although I’m yet to be able to recover the post I wrote about the fallacy of Pizzagate and how it turned some of the more revealing aspects of the Podesta leaks into a circus sideshow for mass media consumption, one that was successfully able to throw water on the fire building beneath the exposure of the occult networks behind much of the intelligence honeytrapping and blackmail networks, the point I made in that post of not throwing out the baby with the bath water still stands.

Whether or not Seymour Hersch is right when he points the finger at Seth Rich for the DNC leaks and being the Wikileaks source is becoming increasingly irrelevant as a topic. It’s obvious that despite the twisting self-destructive Manafort/Russia scandal that the American left are choosing as their hill to die on, there really is no fire behind the smoke as far as Trump is concerned. If anything the Democrats are going to fall on their own sword if they pursue the matter any further, but that does not mean that they will necessarily stop pursuing it or order their political arms in the mainstream media to back off, because they fear what lurks beneath. The reason that mainstream media has focused almost entirely on the near mythical Russian origin of the Steele dossier or the DNC hack and not the actual information covered in those documents is simply that they can’t afford to even begin to pick apart the level of criminality present in those documents, lest the entire house of cards fall, if you’ll excuse the pun.

Continue reading Pizza, Presidio and Psy-ops: Part 2

Crimes of the Saxa-Gotha-Coburg: The Dutroux Case and the Mothers of Darkness

If you want to know how Saxa-Gotha-Coburg pedophile rings keep politicians in check in Britain, then check out the BBC exposing how the Saxa-Gotha-Coburg pedophile ring kept politicians in check in Belgium after the Michel Nihoul and Marc Dutroux case led all the way back to Chateu De Amerois back in the late 90’s.

The fact that both David Icke’s interviews with Arizona Wilder and Cathy O’Brian’s testimony focused on Chateau de Amerois (known to occult and child abuse ring researchers as the Mothers of Darkness Castle) is a lynch-pin piece of the puzzle in putting together how the Swiss house of Saxa-Gotha and Coburg are acting as the hidden hand behind both exoteric politics and the esoteric occult societies.

Continue reading Crimes of the Saxa-Gotha-Coburg: The Dutroux Case and the Mothers of Darkness

Revelation of the Method; Seeding Ritual into Society

So the main question i get when talking about this stuff is, whats going on in the entertainment industry? The idea that certain artists like Lady Gaga, Madonna, Jay-Z and Beyonce are involved in the ‘Illuminati’ and use their symbolism and thematic imagery all over their videos has become a meme in itself. So why would people who are a part of these secret orders who are supposed to keep doctrines secret, splash them all over the media?

A clusterfuck of mind control I will explain one day, I promise....

In the 17th century, the Chaldean Kabbalists found a new messiah, literally and figuratively, in Sabbat Zevi. Zevi was a fully initiated Blood Ritualist, pedophile and sacrificer. Zevi was tired of having to hide his religion, he wanted to be worshiped as the god he believed he was and live in a civilisation where the profane offered their children to him to sacrifice, instead of the secret orders having to do their deeds under the veil of secrecy.

In the same way that millions of republican Americans yearn for a return to Reagan, or the KKK yearns for a return to the plantation, or the British conservatives yearn for a return to Victorianism or indeed the Christians yearn for a return to the days of Eden, the Zevites yearn for a return to the days of Babylon, immediately preceding the revolution of moses and monotheism, where they openly ruled the most advanced civilisation the world had ever seen to that point.

The historical record of the practice of sacrifice is fairly well known. In Hebrew scripture, it is noted that the valley of Himmon, called Gehinnom in ancient times,  was known for many generations as the Tophet, an area at the foot of Mount Zion where the followers of Moloch and Baal would conduct child sacrifices. Similarly, the accounts of the Ancient Greek historians like Plutarch and Philo are replete with the practice and trace it’s movement west from the Chaldeas into Turkey and Tunisia through the Carthaginian empire . Deucalion states

“In former times they (the Carthaginians) had been accustomed to sacrifice to this god the noblest of their sons, but more recently, secretly buying and nurturing children, they had sent these to the sacrifice”

The Carthaginians were sacrificing to ‘Cronos’ (Saturn) who was otherwise known as the chief god of the Carthaginian pantheon, Bal Ammūn or Baal Hammon. The etymological links here are self evident. In 200 b.c., Tertullian wrote of how the Roman procurator had arrested and killed all the child sacrificing priests, although “That Holy crime persists in secret”. In Carthage too, the encroaching invasion of the Achaemenid Empire saw an end to the practice, although it continued in secret among the priest class.
It’s plain to see that in these civilizations, child sacrifice was an accepted norm. It was not imposed by the hierarchy as such, it was openly practiced by the entire civilisation. The parents were often to people doing the ritual, and it was often their firstborn or most beloved child who was sacrificed. It is this condition to which the Chaldean Kabbalists would have us all return..

 So how do they do it? How does a group of ritual magi gain control of a society like the west, that has been raised to believe that sin must be avoided and sacrifice, black magic and sexual ritual are ‘satanic’ and must be rooted out wherever they exist?

Well, as with most religions, the trick is in catching them young. So here’s a perfect example. Recently a video was released (probably dug up by Brad Pitts legal team) of Angelina Jolie talking at a party about the serpent rituals she was involved in as part of her own initiation process. In it, she specifically talks about the ritual use of pain and self harm as both a cleansing and a spiritual act.

Theologians will quickly recognise this as the doctrine of self flagellation, something brought to the awareness of millions of people in the work of Dan Brown and in particular, his portrayal of the quasi masonic secret society ‘Opus Dei’. Occultists will immediately recognise both the significance of the serpent ritual, and masonic/Buddhist/eastern mystic theologians will recognise the significance of the idea of ritual self harm as a way of mastering the senses and perfecting the self in order to reach the godhead. There is nothing stunningly new or revelatory about any of these doctrines. They are literally millennia old and can be studied from their inception to their modern day expression

So who is Angelina Jolie? Well, she is what you would call Hollywood royalty. As the Daughter of the now loudly Zionist lunatic, John Voight, Angelina is directly related to the Saxa-Gotha-Coburg family that comprise the majority of European Royalty, who’s centuries old interest and practice of Kabbalah need not be reiterated for emphasis again here. Her life story is full of memberships to occult groups, dabbling in everything from Wicca to enochian sex ritual, so much so that the true history of the covens and lodges she has had membership of and how she has been used is probably too horrific to bear thinking about. (See Cathy O Brian) Her first marriage to Billy Bob Thornton was notable for its coverage of their blood ritual and interest in tantra and the like. She was splashed all over the ‘lads mags’ and coveted for her beauty by fashionistas, she was built up as an icon.
It must be remembered, most of our modern day technology was invented by kabbalistic freemasons looking for magical effects. Television was invented when John Logie Baird attempted to build a spirit box to channel enochian ‘angels’. Radio was appropriated from Tesla by the Masons who similarly thought, as Tesla did, that the medium could be used to contact spiritual entities. The masons used these inventions the same way they used the popularisation of the Ouija board and stage magic during the occult revival of the 1800’s. They used them to spread and plant their philosophy into the public consciousness. They replaced the magic wands made of Holly wood and Illusions they used in centuries past with one huge illusion called Hollywood and built huge corporations like MGM, Disney and universal to continue their occult worship of the goddess Media, slowly but surely seeding their philosophy out by continually reinforcing particular archetypal rituals and mystery plays on screen called ‘movies’ and ‘television’ and continually reinforcing their world view through ‘NEWS’. When everything from music to art became corporatised, there was no need for the Kabbalist societies and the masons to infiltrate these outlets, as ever since the enlightenment the predominant artists and musicians had either come from the secret orders, or were patronised and then initiated by them. Art and music have to an extent, become a self replicating kabbalistic entity, given how everything from the perspective ratios and thematic symbolism we revere in art to the musical scales and the vibrational frequency of an ‘A’ we use in music have come directly from the study of Kabbalah in the secret societies.
So after she became popular and ‘relevant’ by playing the role of the whore of Babylon, selling herself as a ritual sex object, she began starring in illuminist mystery plays, everything from full blown Illuminati allegories like ‘Tomb Raider’, to glorification’s of secret intelligence orders like Salt, Mr and Mrs Smith. She even went full bore Disney Witch in Maleficent. Her filmography is very enlightening when looked at through the lens of the Kabbalist, just like Madonnas music videos are very different when that lens is focused.
So after Brad Pitt was finished with another member of Hollywood royalty, Jennifer Aniston, he and Jolie were paired up and while he continued his kabbalistic initiation in movies like ‘Babel’ and ‘Tree of Life’, Angelina became a ‘humanitarian advocate’ for the UN where she was sent (history of blood ritual sex magick and all) into areas of great poverty and destruction and immediately set about facilitating adoptions, building children’s homes and herself adopting a whole bunch of kids. Something Madonna also did. In the context of what we have discussed here, ill leave it up to you to decide what you think these homes are for, and who these child adoptions are going to,
Its important to realise that in many ways, our celebrity culture has been just another manifestation of the apparently ingrained human need for religion. In the age of the atheist, we have begun to refer to it as the cult of celebrity because it displays all the tenets of a cultist religion. It invokes worship and derision, there are idols and icons, it has its own exoteric moral code in what we have labelled ‘liberal PC culture’ and even its own secret dark lodge in Scientology and other related Crowleyist, quasi masonic orders. We hold these people up to specific public scrutiny and they become saints, martyrs or devils according to how they are portrayed by media, and we crucify them when they fall from grace. This is religion folks, its scandalized, hyperbolic, capitalist religion, but it’s religion nonetheless.

It would seem that through generations of reiteration, our moral structure has evolved to essentially be one that promotes altruism at best, and survival at worst, but in the argument of nature verses nurture we see a clear indication that although humans appear to learn altruism through maturity, it is easy to subvert that maturity by cutting a human being off from his natural mental evolution that occurs through interaction and the realisation of the need to live in co-operation with his ecosystem and more importantly, his peer group, and instead forcibly teach a doctrine, whether it be some form of self supremacy or religious indoctrination, that ‘liberates’ the individual from the burden of that responsibility. This is what the Cremation of Care ritual carried out at Bohemian Grove every year is about. It is a religion of absolving the individual for the moral crimes he must commit to advance the great work. There can be absolutely no doubt of the similarity to Bohemian Grove and the Tophet.

022516d1 tumblr_n8hevp8xcj1qdoy52o1_500

The Bohemians and the Kabbalists of this world realised long ago that the grip of the church was slipping and that the mass media was the alter at which people would pray, the church through which the public would gain their worldview and set their moral code. Knowing this, they were the ones, through their control of the vast masonic network,  who ensured that they would be disseminating the worldview by ensuring they were the ones who created and controlled the media and its outlets. This is how they would begin Alice Bailey and Aleister Crowley’s great ‘Externalisation of the Hierarchy’, by using the media as the fountainhead from which the revelation of the method would occur.

So when we hear someone like Jolie talk about the occult practice of cleansing through pain, it is important to look at how that has been seeded into out own culture and understand that this is not an actress talking about wild parties, its a black magician talking about occult ritual. One of the reasons I initially became so interested in this subject as a whole is that I myself fell headlong into one of the archetypal straight off the production line sub-cultures that I was unwittingly given to choose from. I was a ‘metalhead’, straight out of the 80’s, I was weaned on Metallica and Megadeth, I bought Metal Hammer and Kerrang! and chewed them up. I got into tribal warfare with dance music fans and as I became ever more elitist and arrogant about my own ‘taste in music’ I found myself reading books about my icons and dressing in black, embracing gothdom and all the horrific Emo-ness it entailed, I began being loudly atheist and bashing religions of every stripe, I became a quasi communist ironic satanist, because that’s what my ‘heroes’ were, anachronistic to popular culture and a contrarian in every sense. Thing is, you know exactly what I’m talking about, you all knew someone like me, you probably still do, hell I know a fucking shit-ton of them, we all used to go to the same gigs, and that’s because we were a herd, a group of people who were attracted to one of the many cookie cutter counter culture’s offered by the corporate magi. That kind of thing has been going on since the so-called counter culture first gained traction.

And that’s really the point. You’ll be glad to know I’m somewhat recovered now. Somewhere in the mess of misanthropy I discovered that what I actually liked about Metallica and Megadeth and Dreamtheater was their incredibly well crafted classically inspired but brutal thrash metal, so I left the counter culture behind and turned my obsessive brain toward the noble and spiritual craft of learning to play it on the guitar, and then I started writing my own music and got together with some amazing dudes who want to do the same thing, and now I am writing my own classically inspired yet brutal heavy metal and yes, widely grinning as I write that. But tangent aside, the baggage of reading Anton LaVey and Eliphas Levi and Alister Crowley never left me, and the more my academic venture into studying history began to wander into specifically studying masonic and occulted history and indeed, the history of the occult, I began to realise that there was a connection between the seemingly ubiquitous satanic imagery in heavy metal and the generally atheist attitudes, misanthropic worldview and extremely anti-christian vibe it tended to put out. I remain an ardent agnostic these days, so stepping back from the clique-ishness of it all I was able to look back and see how the popular media surrounding the subculture had endlessly divided the entire art into smaller sub-genres and how tribalistic everyone became about their chosen style. I was able to re-read the lyrical output and biographies of my heroes and recognise that actually, these people for the most part were not ironic Satanists at all, they were new-agers, they were theosophists, they were kabbalists, they spoke about Blavatsky and Crowley, the super famous ones understood their role and the wider role of art in the revelation of the method and they were willing to work with the right producers, promote the right image and revel in it all as the freedom of artistic expression, the same way that Lady Gaga does when she attends ‘spirit cooking’ dinners with Marina Abrahmovic. I re-read seemingly incoherent and obscure interviews in magazines like Kerrang! with people like Marilyn Manson or Tool and was suddenly able to go ‘holy shit, THAT’s what they were talking about’ or ‘So this is why they keep writing stories about that Norwegian Metal band that burned down the church’ etc.

One thing I noted specifically was that new-age mysticism was heavily promoted, in the more blatant examples like Mr. Manson, the promotion of the new age and it’s direct birth from Kabbalist movements like theosophy is sprawled out for anyone with the eyes to see. Like the Iommi’s and Paige’s before him, Brian Warner’s entire career is a masterwork in the revelation of the method. The other band I mention, Tool, are a far more intricate working. They are quick to humor when the Crowleyist aspect of their music is pointed out and indeed some of their merchandise is poking fun at the fact. But they are at the same time a band obsessed with sacred geometry and mapping it to music. Their music and artwork is a multilayered experience whose full understanding can be considered an initiatory process in itself, that is, after all, the entire point. Both Mariyln Manson  and Tool are great examples of musicians who understand and view their music and careers as an act of alchemical transmutation and who view it as a privilege to have their art externalise the hierarchy. In relative terms Manson is a Jackson Pollock, whereas Tool are a Da Vinci but that is no slight on either, they are both playing a role.

But I do have some personal experience of how this can manifest into some bad choices, and it will allow me to come full circle and explain why I pointed to this particular revelation about Angelina Jolie in the first place and what it has to do with revelation of the method.
In those halcyon teenage spikey haired 90’s goth days I was telling you about before, I began to notice a disturbing trend. Rock and Metal moved away from the high concept influences of Rush and Dreamtheater, the hard realism of Metallica or the anti authoritarianism of Megadeth, into the social awareness of Nirvana, Pearl Jam and Rage Against the Machine, but it increasingly moved from dealing with real world issues to personal ones, specifically parental abuse or neglect. There arose, around the pop-culture metal scene at least, a culture of first focusing on then kind of uncomfortably glorifying the most angst ridden, semi-cathartic, depressive content. as a result, the culture surrounding it became more and more misanthropic, depressive and nihilist. There was a sudden epidemic of depressed Emo’s and goths, all tribalistically fighting over their particular sub-genre and all pretending to be wiccans or being obsessed with vampires or zombies or death. As I’ve said, I had the candles in my room, the skull ashtray, I had pentagrams on everything and some offensive T-shirts. I read some weird books and pretended, despite my pretty sheltered upbringing, that I hated the world and nothing my parents had done was right and I was depressed. One of the things I had remembered a singer in Kerrang! talking about was cutting herself. How it released endorphin’s and acted like and anti-depressant, so at the times when I was at my most misanthropic and ‘depressed’ I would do the same. I’m not ashamed to admit that nowadays because to be honest, it was no more than a few times and I cottoned on pretty quickly that it didn’t seem like a very constructive way to deal with my perceived problems. What it did do however, was to give me some small appreciation for how such a ritual could become obsessive. Channeling and focusing that angst and then having that moment of ritual release was addicting. It was pleasurable on some level, the endorphins were definitely released.
Looking back having read the primary texts and seen how these ideas are seeded into popular culture, having gone through theosophy all the way to ritual sex magic I can look back and see that for exactly what it was. I can see how the idea of spiritual release or soul cleansing through bloodletting was presented in an entirely benign fashion through a magazine, and how if I were a little more impressionable or had actual problems to deal with, I could see how I could end up getting into this kind of ritual behavior, reading material that explains it and then seeking out other people who read the same stuff.

The Guardian:NHS figures show ‘shocking’ rise in self-harm among young

So when I see Angelina Jolie talking about bloodletting, taking care to make the distinction that it’s not sexual and not to be confused with S&M, I recognise what she’s talking about, and I know she has also read multiple Masonic and Crowleyist works on using ritual bloodletting and sexual magic to reach transcendental altered states of consciousness and make contact with the Godhead. This is the carrot offered to all initiates by the modern day priest class. I was lucky in that I wasn’t born into these cults. That stable upbringing I tried to rebel against allowed me to lock myself in a room until I learned all of “Master of Puppets”, Angelina’s upbringing forced her to interact with some of the most noted Kabbalists on the planet, there was really no escaping it for her.
She remains however, a perfect example of how artists, musicians and actors alike have for the most part, bought into the theology of Masonry, Kabbalah and Lucifarianism in general, and it lets us see how those at work behind them are using these media to externalise their moral code and their religious beliefs out into the wider mainstream. It truly works, through these icons, the theosophists can manifest their will with the consent of mainstream opinion, who don’t realise how that which divides us, gender, age, culture, raceis being manipulated to the extreme on all sides.

But remember, if you forget your PC code, there will always be a witch pushing the globalist agenda